Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Breastfeeding And When To Introduce Gluten


Guest cassidy

Recommended Posts

Guest cassidy

I went to a celiac support group meeting this weekend and I was asking about whether gluten does go through breastmilk and when to introduce gluten because I had read so many conflicting theories that I didn't know what to do. They gave me an email address and I just got off the phone with Dr. Swati Kolpuru at the Center for Celiac Research.

She said based on what they know now, gluten does not go through breastmilk. She also said based on what is known now there doesn't seem to be any difference in the chances of developing celiac if the child is introduced to gluten when they are introduced to other solids (around 6 months) or if you hold off until they are 1 or 2. She also said they haven't seen a difference if the child is on a "reduced gluten diet" or allowed to eat as much gluten as they want.

She is currently doing a study to address some of these questions. They enroll babies and keep them gluten-free until 6 months. Then everyone is given a powder to mix in their their kid's food. 1/2 people get powder that contains gluten and the other half get powder that doesn't have gluten. They first test the child to make sure they have the celiac gene. Then they do periodic blood tests to make sure the baby is ok. They also have a nutritionist on board to answer any questions about the baby's diet. Everything is free and they mail you everything. The email address is: GlutenProject@Peds.umaryland.edu. A parent has to have been officially diagnosed with a biopsy so I didn't qualify, but it sounds like a great program for anyone who does qualify.

Who knows if these studies will lead to different theories than what is known now, but at least they are trying to figure everything out.

I just wanted to pass this on because what she told me wasn't what I was hearing from other sources. She talked to me for like 15 minutes and was very helpful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



happygirl Collaborator

Cassidy,

Thanks so much for posting that information! I am sure it will help others....Research is so important.

Interesting...because others have said that it can be.

Laura

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dionnek Enthusiast

Very interesting. I was wondering recently (and maybe you discussed this with her?) whether it was better to breast feed or not when the mother is a celiac but is somehow still ingesting gluten in her system. I was dx in May, had my follow up biopsy in Oct. which showed still flattened villi (i.e., NO HEALING, even though I've been very thourough on this whole gluten-free thing even down to the shampoos/lotions, etc.), found out I was 8 weeks pregnant in Nov., and am now 12 weeks. I was wondering if I continue to somehow ingest gluten so that my intestines do not recover, would that be bad then to be breastfeeding (would my elevated antibodies somehow affect the baby)? Or, vice versa, say I am healed and continue gluten-free, will my baby not develop the correct antibodies to fight off gluten? I am not a scientist, so maybe I'm just over analyzing this and not making any sense :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Michi8 Contributor
Cassidy,

Thanks so much for posting that information! I am sure it will help others....Research is so important.

Interesting...because others have said that it can be.

Laura

I believe that there are a number anecdotal reports of gluten passing on to baby through breastmilk, but this has not been confirmed through research. At this point, if a mom feels that being gluten free during breastfeeding is helping their baby, then there is not harm in doing so.

Michelle

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Michi8 Contributor
Very interesting. I was wondering recently (and maybe you discussed this with her?) whether it was better to breast feed or not when the mother is a celiac but is somehow still ingesting gluten in her system. I was dx in May, had my follow up biopsy in Oct. which showed still flattened villi (i.e., NO HEALING, even though I've been very thourough on this whole gluten-free thing even down to the shampoos/lotions, etc.), found out I was 8 weeks pregnant in Nov., and am now 12 weeks. I was wondering if I continue to somehow ingest gluten so that my intestines do not recover, would that be bad then to be breastfeeding (would my elevated antibodies somehow affect the baby)? Or, vice versa, say I am healed and continue gluten-free, will my baby not develop the correct antibodies to fight off gluten? I am not a scientist, so maybe I'm just over analyzing this and not making any sense :blink:

There is a risk to the developing fetus if a celiac mother continues to consume gluten, due to malabsorption of essential nutrients. I imagine this would be the same for breastfeeding in that it may affect the nutrient level in the breastmilk...and risk that the baby does not receive adequate nutrition.

Michelle

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest cassidy
Very interesting. I was wondering recently (and maybe you discussed this with her?) whether it was better to breast feed or not when the mother is a celiac but is somehow still ingesting gluten in her system. I was dx in May, had my follow up biopsy in Oct. which showed still flattened villi (i.e., NO HEALING, even though I've been very thourough on this whole gluten-free thing even down to the shampoos/lotions, etc.), found out I was 8 weeks pregnant in Nov., and am now 12 weeks. I was wondering if I continue to somehow ingest gluten so that my intestines do not recover, would that be bad then to be breastfeeding (would my elevated antibodies somehow affect the baby)? Or, vice versa, say I am healed and continue gluten-free, will my baby not develop the correct antibodies to fight off gluten? I am not a scientist, so maybe I'm just over analyzing this and not making any sense :blink:

Sorry, I didn't ask her any of your questions. If you have been officially diagnosed then your baby would qualify for the study and you could contact her yourself and ask. It seemed like a great resource and if I qualified for it I definitely would have joined.

I believe that there are a number anecdotal reports of gluten passing on to baby through breastmilk, but this has not been confirmed through research. At this point, if a mom feels that being gluten free during breastfeeding is helping their baby, then there is not harm in doing so.

Michelle

I really had thought that gluten did go through breastmilk, I read that in many places. My own mother told me that I had D every time she breastfed me when I was a baby. I certainly think that people should do whatever they feel comfortable with. I was simply posting what this doctor told me. It seems like she is leading the research and if anyone would know the latest it would be her. At the same time, she did say that everything she told me is based on what we know now and that may change once they complete this study and other studies in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
covsooze Enthusiast

Dionne - I was diagnosed when my son was 2 and I had breastfed him for 18 months. In our case, my malabsorbtion didn't effect him - he obviously knew what he needed and got it all!! However, I think it gave me more problems as it obviously left me with even less in the way of nutrients.

Sounds like a very interesting study. As the breastfeeding, in hindsight, effected me so badly (being undiagnosed at the time), I often wonder if it was worth it in terms of having passed any protection on to DS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Jestgar Rising Star
Very interesting. I was wondering recently (and maybe you discussed this with her?) whether it was better to breast feed or not when the mother is a celiac but is somehow still ingesting gluten in her system. I was dx in May, had my follow up biopsy in Oct. which showed still flattened villi (i.e., NO HEALING, even though I've been very thourough on this whole gluten-free thing even down to the shampoos/lotions, etc.), found out I was 8 weeks pregnant in Nov., and am now 12 weeks. I was wondering if I continue to somehow ingest gluten so that my intestines do not recover, would that be bad then to be breastfeeding (would my elevated antibodies somehow affect the baby)? Or, vice versa, say I am healed and continue gluten-free, will my baby not develop the correct antibodies to fight off gluten? I am not a scientist, so maybe I'm just over analyzing this and not making any sense :blink:

No person should ever have to "fight off gluten"

Several studies have shown that gliadin (the bad protein from gluten) IS transmitted in breastmilk.

Also antibodies are transmitted with breastmilk, so sending bad antibodies that could potentially attack your baby's intestine isn't such a good idea.

Healthy mom's make healthy babies - don't eat gluten.

If you're absolutely positive that you aren't eating gluten, think about casein. Someone here posted a study that shows that casein (from milk) can cause similar damage in some people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Michi8 Contributor
Sorry, I didn't ask her any of your questions. If you have been officially diagnosed then your baby would qualify for the study and you could contact her yourself and ask. It seemed like a great resource and if I qualified for it I definitely would have joined.

I really had thought that gluten did go through breastmilk, I read that in many places. My own mother told me that I had D every time she breastfed me when I was a baby. I certainly think that people should do whatever they feel comfortable with. I was simply posting what this doctor told me. It seems like she is leading the research and if anyone would know the latest it would be her. At the same time, she did say that everything she told me is based on what we know now and that may change once they complete this study and other studies in the future.

Personally, I think more gets into breastmilk than researches know (or admit?) I know my own children were very much impacted by what I ate during breastfeeding...I simply avoided foods that seemed to correlate with their health issues. Didn't clear it up completely, however, (I was not gluten free either) until they grew to about 20 pounds. I have heard the anecdote that once babies get to about that weight, their GI systems settle down. Don't know if that's true or not, but it seemed to work that way with my boys. :)

Michelle

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Michi8 Contributor
Dionne - I was diagnosed when my son was 2 and I had breastfed him for 18 months. In our case, my malabsorbtion didn't effect him - he obviously knew what he needed and got it all!! However, I think it gave me more problems as it obviously left me with even less in the way of nutrients.

Sounds like a very interesting study. As the breastfeeding, in hindsight, effected me so badly (being undiagnosed at the time), I often wonder if it was worth it in terms of having passed any protection on to DS.

Breastfeeding is worth it. It's still the perfect food for babies...providing the correct nutritition at each developmental stage, and providing immunity. The body will do its best to ensure that the baby is getting the nutrition it needs. Breastfeeding is also a stage of normal breast development, and decreases the chance a woman will develop breast cancer (cuumulative effect based on the length of time a woman breastfeeds all of her children.)

Michelle

Link to comment
Share on other sites
covsooze Enthusiast
Breastfeeding is worth it. It's still the perfect food for babies...providing the correct nutritition at each developmental stage, and providing immunity. The body will do its best to ensure that the baby is getting the nutrition it needs. Breastfeeding is also a stage of normal breast development, and decreases the chance a woman will develop breast cancer (cuumulative effect based on the length of time a woman breastfeeds all of her children.)

Michelle

I agree :) As for normal breast development, why does it make small breats shrink even more? :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Michi8 Contributor
I agree :) As for normal breast development, why does it make small breats shrink even more? :ph34r:

Just because it's normal, doesn't mean we have to like it. LOL! :lol: I'm not too thrilled with the shape I'm in after breastfeeding 3 kids (6 years total.) The thing is, though, it's pregnancy, not breastfeeding, that creates the physical change in shape. So whether you breastfeed or not, they'll never look the same again. :P

Michelle

Link to comment
Share on other sites
imagine22 Contributor

I had also read that it was transferred through breast milk - and this made a lot of sense to me as Im coeliac and for the first 3 months of my life i failed to thrive despite my mother thinking i was being breastfed plenty - she then switched to formula (gluten free) and i immediately started to thrive.

re breast shape sure some changes are due to pregnancy but the vast majority of the difference is the breast feeding unfortunately :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Michi8 Contributor
I had also read that it was transferred through breast milk - and this made a lot of sense to me as Im coeliac and for the first 3 months of my life i failed to thrive despite my mother thinking i was being breastfed plenty - she then switched to formula (gluten free) and i immediately started to thrive.

re breast shape sure some changes are due to pregnancy but the vast majority of the difference is the breast feeding unfortunately :)

Breastfeeding itself has little impact on the shape of the breasts. It's the enlargement during pregnancy that makes the big difference. I got huge during pregnancy and immediately afterward (engorgement). Once breastfeeding was well established, the size reduced and stablizied. The pregnancy growth and engorgement are going to happen regardless of whether a mother breastfeeds or not. Check out this info: Open Original Shared Link

Michelle

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tarnalberry Community Regular

actually, if you search pubmed, you'll find a number of studies supporting the theory that the 33-mer that triggers the autoimmune response DOES go through breastmilk. quite a surprising number of studies for something supposedly without research. I posted links to a bunch of them nearly a year ago. this definitely is not a new area of research.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

Many babies do much better on formula than breastmilk simply because their mothers aren't properly instructed in just how often you have to nurse a newborn. Most doctors are still telling new moms that they should nurse every 2-3 hours, when in reality, if it's your first baby, you might have to nurse as often as every half hour during the first week!

With my first, I was pumping every 3 hours around the clock--and I did not get a single DROP until the 5th day (thank God, he latched on as soon as there was something in there!). Had the baby latched on before that, I would have assumed that he was getting plenty.

With my second, I let him nurse whenever he wanted, because I was so relieved that he latched on right away. The nurse came in and scolded me for letting him nurse every half hour--she actually said I should let him cry until it was "time." :ph34r:

The doctors and nurses are about as on top of breastfeeding as they are with celiac (in other words, they haven't got a clue).

As far as breastfeeding being something that should be a personal decision--I do wonder about that. I mean, that's like saying that drinking lots of alcohol during pregnancy is a personal decision, or that feeding gluten to a celiac should be a personal decision, isn't it? We KNOW how much better breast milk is than formula. You can make breast milk gluten-free very easily--just stop eating gluten! (And don't forget--cows eat gluten, so milk-based formula would NOT be any more gluten-free than human milk!) Not that it should be compulsive to breastfeed; it's just that people treat the idea so casually, as though it's a choice like what color shirt to wear, when it literally can be a life-or-death decision.

Just ask TCA--she discovered through her meticulous charts that Megan was reacting to the gluten she got from nursing until TCA went gluten-free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
imagine22 Contributor

yes there is massive engorgement from pregnancy and after birth etc but i still dont think its mainly pregnancy that causes the sagging and massive changes to breasts. i was not able to breast feed unfortunately and although mine were massively engorged after birth they went down soon after with no noticeable differences to firmness or shape and no sagging - unlike my friends who breastfed for 6mths plus who complain of having to pick them up to put them into bras. hey perhaps im just genetically predisposed to not have this problem, but i very much doubt it.

im pro breastfeeding (if you can and are comfortable with it - yes its a choice) so i certainly dont think people should avoid it for purely cosmetic reasons! though i think there should be more facts and less mantra which puts unnecessary pressure on women to breastfeed. there are too many breastfeeding nazi's (for clarity im not referring to PP's! just mean generally) and the reality is that plenty of women JUST CAN'T do it regardless of their desire to do so and others pressure that they must or they are negligent mothers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Michi8 Contributor
yes there is massive engorgement from pregnancy and after birth etc but i still dont think its mainly pregnancy that causes the sagging and massive changes to breasts. i was not able to breast feed unfortunately and although mine were massively engorged after birth they went down soon after with no noticeable differences to firmness or shape and no sagging - unlike my friends who breastfed for 6mths plus who complain of having to pick them up to put them into bras. hey perhaps im just genetically predisposed to not have this problem, but i very much doubt it.

im pro breastfeeding (if you can and are comfortable with it - yes its a choice) so i certainly dont think people should avoid it for purely cosmetic reasons! though i think there should be more facts and less mantra which puts unnecessary pressure on women to breastfeed. there are too many breastfeeding nazi's (for clarity im not referring to PP's! just mean generally) and the reality is that plenty of women JUST CAN'T do it regardless of their desire to do so and others pressure that they must or they are negligent mothers.

I won't get into the politics of breastfeeding here...it's just not the forum for that. But have to say that way too many women get poor support in their breastfeeding efforts...making the transition to successful breastfeeding stressful and difficult. ;)

When it comes to how breasts handle the changes during pregnancy and afterward had a lot to do with original shape and size, heredity and reaction to gravity. After my first pregnancy, my breasts (and the rest of my body) handled all the changes quite well. Same with my second pregnancy. Then came my third baby...a combination of it being the third time 'round, age and the effects of gravity took it's toll. Also ended up with tummy stretch marks that I did not get with the first two. BTW, I went from a C to an F cup, and then even larger with engorgement. My breasts never saw that size again during the breastfeeding period(s) (once breastfeeding was well established). If anything, breastfeeding helped, not exacerbated the problem. :)

Michelle

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
betsy7 Rookie

I don't have Celiac disease, but my son and husband do.... and I'm expecting our second child soon. My son's pediatric gastro, who is part of Columbia Presbyterian's Celiac Disease Center in NYC, recommended that I breastfeed our next baby and follow a gluten free diet while breastfeeding. And, she recommended starting to introduce gluten around 5 months in very small amounts.

Also, just in case it helps anyone to hear recommendations, they didn't recommend that I follow a gluten-free diet during pregnancy (I'm not celiac). This came from both Peter Green (head of Columbia's celiac disease center) and our pediatric gastro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
Guest AutumnE

If it were me looking back on our history, I would get genetic testing done through enterolab on him before introducing gluten. I didnt introduce any kind of gluten till she was a year old but not due to gluten since I wasnt aware of it back then. I made all of my own baby food with organic fruits and vegetables. Since we waited till she was six months old to introduce solids (reduces chances of diabetes developing) I didnt have to do cereal. Avocado was her first food and she still loves it, excellent for brain growth. I never fed desserts of any kind like prepared baby food. I always figured fruit was enough of a dessert. I would make it once a week and freeze it in ice cube container size and bag it and label it. Since you only introduce new foods every five days and there are so many different kinds of veggies and fruits and then at 10 months you have meat that time went very fast introducing all the new foods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest AutumnE
I don't have Celiac disease, but my son and husband do.... and I'm expecting our second child soon. My son's pediatric gastro, who is part of Columbia Presbyterian's Celiac Disease Center in NYC, recommended that I breastfeed our next baby and follow a gluten free diet while breastfeeding. And, she recommended starting to introduce gluten around 5 months in very small amounts.

Also, just in case it helps anyone to hear recommendations, they didn't recommend that I follow a gluten-free diet during pregnancy (I'm not celiac). This came from both Peter Green (head of Columbia's celiac disease center) and our pediatric gastro.

Betsy-I would consider following the gluten free diet. I dont know if gluten would cross the placenta or not but I know you are told to not ingest peanuts if you have peanut allergies in your family while pregnant to reduce the risk of it happening to your child so it sounds like the foods would cross it. It would also make cross contamination less likely for your whole family.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,089
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    AnaRRR
    Newest Member
    AnaRRR
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Posterboy
      Nacina, Knitty Kitty has given you good advice. But I would say/add find a Fat Soluble B-1 like Benfotiamine for best results.  The kind found in most Multivitamins have a very low absorption rate. This article shows how taking a Fat Soluble B-1 can effectively help absorption by 6x to7x times. https://www.naturalmedicinejournal.com/journal/thiamine-deficiency-and-diabetic-polyneuropathy quoting from the article.... "The group ingesting benfotiamine had maximum plasma thiamine levels that were 6.7 times higher than the group ingesting thiamine mononitrate.32" Also, frequency is much more important than amount when it comes to B-Vitamin. These are best taken with meals because they provide the fat for better absorption. You will know your B-Vitamin is working properly when your urine becomes bright yellow all the time. This may take two or three months to achieve this.......maybe even longer depending on how low he/you are. The Yellow color is from excess Riboflavin bypassing the Kidneys....... Don't stop them until when 2x a day with meals they start producing a bright yellow urine with in 2 or 3 hours after the ingesting the B-Complex...... You will be able to see the color of your urine change as the hours go by and bounce back up after you take them in the evening. When this happens quickly......you are now bypassing all the Riboflavin that is in the supplement. The body won't absorb more than it needs! This can be taken as a "proxy" for your other B-Vitamin levels (if taken a B-Complex) ...... at least at a quick and dirty level......this will only be so for the B-1 Thiamine levels if you are taking the Fat Soluble forms with the Magnesium as Knitty Kitty mentioned. Magnesium is a Co-Factor is a Co-factor for both Thiamine and Vitamin D and your sons levels won't improve unless he also takes Magnesium with his Thiamine and B-Complex. You will notice his energy levels really pick up.  His sleeping will improve and his muscle cramps will get better from the Magnesium! Here is nice blog post that can help you Thiamine and it's many benefits. I hope this is helpful but it is not medical advice God speed on your son's continued journey I used to be him. There is hope! 2 Tim 2:7 “Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things” this included. Posterboy by the grace of God,  
    • trents
      I'll answer your second question first. The single best antibody test for monitoring celiac blood antibody levels is the tTG-IGA and it is very cost effective. For this reason, it is the most popular and often the only test ordered by physicians when checking for celiac disease. There are some people who actually do have celiac disease who will score negatives on this test anyway because of anomalies in their immune system but your wife is not one of them. So for her, the tTG-IGA should be sufficient. It is highly sensitive and highly specific for celiac disease. If your wife gets serious about eating gluten free and stays on a gluten free diet for the duration, she should experience healing in her villous lining, normalization in her antibody numbers and avoid reaching a celiac health crisis tipping point. I am attaching an article that will provide guidance for getting serious about gluten free living. It really is an advantage if all wheat products are taken out of the house and other household members adopt gluten free eating in order to avoid cross contamination and mistakes.  
    • Anmol
      Thanks this is helpful. Couple of follow -ups- that critical point till it stays silent is age dependent or dependent on continuing to eat gluten. In other words if she is on gluten-free diet can she stay on silent celiac disease forever?    what are the most cost effective yet efficient test to track the inflammation/antibodies and see if gluten-free is working . 
    • trents
      Welcome to the community forum, @Anmol! There are a number of blood antibody tests that can be administered when diagnosing celiac disease and it is normal that not all of them will be positive. Three out of four that were run for you were positive. It looks pretty conclusive that you have celiac disease. Many physicians will only run the tTG-IGA test so I applaud your doctor for being so thorough. Note, the Immunoglobulin A is not a test for celiac disease per se but a measure of total IGA antibody levels in your blood. If this number is low it can cause false negatives in the individual IGA-based celiac antibody tests. There are many celiacs who are asymptomatic when consuming gluten, at least until damage to the villous lining of the small bowel progresses to a certain critical point. I was one of them. We call them "silent" celiacs".  Unfortunately, being asymptomatic does not equate to no damage being done to the villous lining of the small bowel. No, the fact that your wife is asymptomatic should not be viewed as a license to not practice strict gluten free eating. She is damaging her health by doing so and the continuing high antibody test scores are proof of that. The antibodies are produced by inflammation in the small bowel lining and over time this inflammation destroys the villous lining. Continuing to disregard this will catch up to her. While it may be true that a little gluten does less harm to the villous lining than a lot, why would you even want to tolerate any harm at all to it? Being a "silent" celiac is both a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing in the sense of being able to endure some cross contamination in social settings without embarrassing repercussions. It's a curse in that it slows down the learning curve of avoiding foods where gluten is not an obvious ingredient, yet still may be doing damage to the villous lining of the small bowel. GliadinX is helpful to many celiacs in avoiding illness from cross contamination when eating out but it is not effective when consuming larger amounts of gluten. It was never intended for that purpose. Eating out is the number one sabotager of gluten free eating. You have no control of how food is prepared and handled in restaurant kitchens.  
    • knitty kitty
      Forgot one... https://www.hormonesmatter.com/eosinophilic-esophagitis-sugar-thiamine-sensitive/
×
×
  • Create New...